Wednesday, November 13, 2024
spot_imgspot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

Govt rules out reallocation of 80 MNAs despite detailed reserved seats verdict – Pakistan

The federal government on Monday once again ruled out the reallocation of 80 MNAs of the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) to the PTI despite the issuance of the long-awaited detailed Supreme Court verdict in the reserved seats case.

The 8-5 majority July order had declared ex-premier Imran Khan’s PTI eligible for seats reserved for women and minorities, dealing a major setback to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s ruling coalition. The eight judges had ruled that out of a list of 80 MNAs, 39 belonged to the PTI, and gave 41 others the chance to resubmit their party affiliation. Despite the 8-5 split, 11 out of the 13 judges had declared the PTI a parliamentary party.

A litany of developments occurred since the verdict from changes in the elections law seeking to bar the PTI-backed ‘independent’ legislators from joining the party to the apex court rebuking the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for not fully implementing its short verdict. Moreover, the National Assembly speaker wrote a letter to the ECP, telling it that the court order could not be acted upon.

The 70-page detailed judgment released today was authored by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, who is set to succeed incumbent Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa as the top judge in October.

Addressing a press conference later in the day, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said the recent amendments in the Elections Act were still in play and thus, as per the law, it was not possible to “reverse the clock” regarding the status of lawmakers.

He said various prior court verdicts maintained that parliament’s right to legislation would have greater priority over the apex court’s verdicts.

Tarar said the review petitions against the reserved seats’ verdicts were still valid and had gained even more importance after the detailed verdict.

The minister said he was also “pained” by the “strict words” used for the two dissenting judges in the detailed note. “All judges in the court are equal and seniority does not weigh on decisions… difference is the beauty of debate and logic whenever we look at something in-depth and different opinions emerge and something better is found from them,” he added.

Tarar said the issue on the constitutional and legal plane was that the list of lawmakers to be allocated had to be decided as per the law despite whatever the detailed verdict said. He added that the recent Elections Act amendments were now a part of the law.

“In their presence, how these seats are to be allocated and what is the way for that law to be overruled, these are all the questions to which the answers are not in this detailed verdict.”

Tarar said the court’s interpretation should not go to the extent of “changing the plain letter of the law and Constitution”.

Regarding the future after the verdict, Tarar said: “The uncertainty is still there. As per the country’s law, those considered independent lawmakers cannot leave the SIC since their action is irreversible.”

He said keeping in mind the relevant provisions of the law, the seats could not be given to the PTI. “The court’s verdict is otherwise. It seems to me there is a need for a further round of litigation,” Tarar added.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles